How to Defeat Mr. Harper and his Regressive Conservatives


As the Harper-led (dictated?) Conservatives continue on their path of wrecking the Canada we once knew by destroying both our economy and ecology, our peace-making place on the world stage, ripping up public support for the people of this land while handing the country over to corporations and China, instituting a secret police act that is reminiscent of Nazi Germany, plus far more, the hand-wringing among most informed Canadians is reaching a crescendo in this election year.

A concerted effort is now underway to convince all the other political parties to cooperate in order to prevent another Conservative-controlled government. Sadly the egos of all parties but the Greens are preventing this kind of cooperation. So, it is thought, the next best option is to convince the electorate to vote for the party that stands the best chance of defeating the Conservatives. This is called “Strategic Voting.”

Problem: it didn’t work the last time. In fact the Conservatives actually won more seats in our present inadequate and antiquated electoral system, despite concerted efforts to vote strategically. What’s worse, evidence shows that such strategic voting strengthens the Conservatives over time!

Why? Because the stronger the call for strategic voting the more the Conservatives use this as a fear tactic of their own, warning their supporters and sympathisers that if they don’t vote Conservative the battle will be lost. Simultaneously the more people are cajoled into voting for a party that is not their first choice the less likely they will vote at all. Voila! The Conservatives gain more votes and the other mainstream parties lose votes. The Cons win!

Second problem: how is it determined which party stands the best chance of defeating the Conservatives in each riding? Why, polls, of course. How accurate are polls? Would you bet your life on them? Remember, for example, the last election in B.C. All of the public polls said the NDP would win quite handily. The result? The exact opposite!!

Lastly, polls fail to count the nearly 50% of the population who do not vote. (The official stat is about 40%, but this number fails to include those who are not currently on the voters list.) Why is this a problem? Because when non-voters turn up at the polls the results change dramatically. In the last federal election Elizabeth May won because a large number of inspired non-voters voted for her! In the last provincial election Green Party Andrew Weaver won with the support of many non-voters. In fact, the highest turn-out rate of any riding in that election was in his riding.

If we want to defeat the Harperite Conservatives we need to strategically learn from their play book. They know that to win they need to suppress the popular vote. This is why they rammed through the un-Fair Elections Act -in order to prevent many non-conservatives from voting. This is also why they organised the robo calls in previous elections, attempting to confuse and discourage non-Conservative people from finding their actual polling station. They learned this winning strategy from their close cousins in the U.S., the Republicans. 

Getting people out to vote makes a real difference. Consider this fact: in the last election the Conservatives were elected to a majority government on the slim margins of only 6,201 votes across 308 ridings! Yet 1.8 million people aged 10-24 did not vote! If only a fraction of these voted (most would not vote Conservative) Harper would not win a majority. Likely not even a minority.


How can we be truly strategic to counter the Conservative and “strategic vote” movement (however well intended they might be)? By encouraging people to vote according to their consciences. To offer them the true hope that the simple act of voting is the key to defeating the Cons. In fact, as a result of helping every eligible voter learn which party best represents their beliefs, hopes, and aspirations, far more voters are more likely to cast their vote. 
 
The root of the word courage is the French cour, meaning “heart.” Unless we encourage people to vote it is unlikely that democracy will survive. As I stated six years ago after the provincial election, democracy is on life-support. However, if we instead turn our anger into courage, with conviction, then we can reclaim Canada as a country that again represents its people and the aspirations of her people.


Count on it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting on this post. Your comment will be moderated before being posted in order to remove spammers.

Popular posts from this blog

Why the NDP has Failed its Supporters

Image
The New Democratic Party has made a vital contribution to both Canada and British Columbia. Once considered to be the "social conscience" of politics, pushing for more progressive policies that benefit workers and the general population. Our national health care system and other notable services came into existence largely through its initiative. As more of us became aware that we utterly rely on a healthy planetary home, the NDP began to include this in its messaging. Eventually the NDP became a coalition of sorts, bringing together its labour wing with its environmental wing. While its labour wing has always been more important for financial and other reasons, many earth-friendly people supported or voted for the NDP, claiming that voting Green was "splitting the vote." As it turns out this is about as true as believing the earth is flat. But it is a belief that has been propagated by the mainstream parties, especially the sometimes acrimonious members of the NDP.
Read more

Reducing homelessness, increasing livability

Image
Simplistic and populist politicians frequently fail to appreciate the long-term consequences of their platform and thrust. Dropping a stone into a still pond send ripples in every direction. Everything is connected and related to some extent; those who have eyes to see will recognise this truth in human activities. I understand the hardships being experienced by increasing numbers of people in the world due to the inflationary effects of higher fossil fuel costs. The ‘ripples’ from their excessive profits have impacted the price of food (largely grown on oil/gas dependent chemical fertilisers, pesticides and other inputs), oil-dependent transportation, and virtually everything else. Now interest rates are rapidly climbing, further impacting those who have limited incomes. In the same way, cities negatively impact the cost of living (and far more) by being car-centric. The physical space to accommodate the automobile takes up valuable real estate that would otherwise be available for
Read more

A Third Approach to the COVID-19 Pandemic; Diversifying our Options

Image
The issue A tremendous amount of fear and anger are presently being felt and expressed in our society over the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of us are tired of the restrictions, especially the lack of easy physical proximity and/or contact, and all of us want this to be over. Those who will not (or cannot) be vaccinated are concerned about their health. Those who have been vaccinated but fear being infected by the un-vaccinated also fear for their health, and believe that if everyone did accept the vaccine the pandemic would finally end. Health authorities and the province are putting a lot of pressure on the un-vaccinated to get the jab. The un-compliant are experiencing a great deal of shaming and shunning. Some of these have become angry (shame often does that) and/or depressed ; some have become militant, organising marches on hospitals and other public sites. This only enrages the public. The battle lines deepen. Nobody is winning this battle. Let’s step back for a moment here.
Read more